The
| Login |
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 12:16 PM
Edited Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 12:16 PM
I can't watch that right now. I have to watch the 24 hour coverage of Natalie Hollaway. Oh my god, she's white and she's still missing. I'll bet Jon Stewart is behind that too.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 12:19 PM
^ the Aruba officials are blaming her parents.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:25 PM
Edited Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:26 PM
that was funny, but weak, as most of john stewart's show, and liberal's arguments in genertal, are.
stewart makes a big deal about the show being a year old, but that is irrelevant. the "war against christmas" (christianity) is not a new phenomenon. it is part of an ongoing effort to eliminate christianity from all areas of american life. o'reilly used the clip as an example of this ongoing effort, and as such it is valid, even though it may be a year old. especially since it is likely that comedy central showed the episode as a rerun this year.
stewart acted incredulous at the idea that o'reilly would make the claim that stewart's little "6 second" joke was a war on christmas. of course that was not what o'reilly was saying. his little joke is not the issue, it's the larger ongoing effort of which his skit is an example.
stewart made a big deal out of using the term "merry christmas" rather than "happy holidays". once again, he makes a joke and acts like he made a solid point, but it does not hold up when challenged. it's not simply using "happy holidays" in place of christmas, i have done that myself. it's fine when you are refering to the holiday season as a whole, but when people make a conscious decision to use happy holidays to eliminate the word CHRISTmas, it becomes an attack on christmas.
regarding stewart's little dig about o'reilly (conservatives) thinking felize navidad (hispanics) are too prevelant, i say: shocking. it's shocking that a whiny, blowhard, liberal would try to classify conservatives as a bunch of racists. why not go back to the same tired playbook and call them anti-poor, or a party of white rednecks. stewart sounds like howard dean to me.
stewart is funny, but his ideas/views are weak.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:30 PM
Bill O'Reilly is a fucking joke.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:35 PM
greymatters—
Damn, you're a dick. Good times.
what did i say that makes me a dick by the way?
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:36 PM
Christianity is kind of gay.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:38 PM
what did i say that makes me a dick by the way?
Nothing in particular, I can just tell. Don't worry, my opinion doesn't matter, but Jesus' does and he thinks you're a dick too. Much love.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:47 PM
Jesus Crist man, stop smoking that conservative crack.
Christmas hasnt been about religion in a long time. It's a hoarish consumption orgy, nothing more. To say a few fringe liberals are trying to eliminate christmas and christianity from american life is beside the point. If you're so concerned with John stewart being responsible for the destruction of christmas you're looking in the wrong place. Chritmas, its celebration and the celebration of other such events should be up to individuals to follow as they see fit on their own terms, it's not society's job to make sure people like yourself are appeased and comforted to continue your christmas orgy of consuming.
go to church, celebrate jesus' birthday, give presents, that's fine I have no problem with that. Besides you still get time off from work around christmas so its not like its difficult to follow the tenets and beliefs of Christmas
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 8:50 PM
Oh no, now Drake's in this, someone please give me a laxative.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 9:03 PM
--Christmas hasnt been about religion in a long time.
there are many people that view christmas as a religious expression, not consumerism. just because you and others like you have rejected Christ from the event doesn't make it so.
--If you're so concerned with John stewart being responsible for the destruction of christmas
if you didn't read my post, it's not John stewart that is waging war against christmas, it's liberal secularism, of which stewart is a part.
--Chritmas, its celebration and the celebration of other such events should be up to individuals to follow as they see fit on their own terms, it's not society's job to make sure people like yourself are appeased
i didn't say it was. i also don't have to appease you by removing christ from christmas. i have the right to try and influence society according to my beliefs, just as you do.
sorry about not putting quotes in italics, i don't know how to. also, this will have to be my last post for the night, so have fun discussing this amongst yourselves.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 9:06 PM
Christmas is awesome. All you religious people need leave us alone and let us celebrate our holiday in peace. Quit twisting this holiday to your agenda. It's about gifts and eggnog and winter and lights and trees and jolly fat people and presents and music and shopping and awesome movies and getting stuff. So leave your Jebus out of it.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 9:16 PM
Edited Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 9:17 PM
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 9:18 PM
Hash, you don't get the 40 virgins if you believe in secularism, that's what my Torah says.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 9:21 PM
Edited Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 9:21 PM
Goddamnit.
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 10:40 PM
Edited Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 10:41 PM
so have fun discussing this amongst yourselves. —question?
If you like Bill O'Reilly so much, why don't you marry him?
Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 10:49 PM
Edited Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 10:50 PM
Friday, December 9, 2005 at 1:04 AM
Friday, December 9, 2005 at 10:09 AM
Edited Friday, December 9, 2005 at 10:10 AM
Question reminds me of my dad. All paranoid about some big societal war on his people. Except instead of Americans versus Arab-Americans its seculars versus Christians. hmmm.
Friday, December 9, 2005 at 10:46 AM
Arabs need their own version of Christmas. The jews have one, the blacks have one, the mexicans have just jumped on board with ours, but the Arabs and the Asians don't really have a big december holiday to call their own.
Friday, December 9, 2005 at 11:04 AM
I think that's because Muslims go off of a lunar calendar instead of the Gregorian one, which is a solar calendar. There are such celebrations, but they shift around the solar year since the lunar calendar is about 11 days shorter.
Friday, December 9, 2005 at 11:30 AM
The Arabs have Christmas 365 days a year and it's called JIHAD.
Saturday, December 17, 2005 at 7:33 AM
Monday, December 19, 2005 at 9:26 PM
[to everytone] As the self appointed, offical representitive of all things christmas [see my name, above]; get over yourselves, all you're religious zealots. Christmas may have been named after christ, but has little to do with christianity as a whole, as the average american celebrates it. Just appreciate it for what it is to "YOU" and stop worrying if other peoples celebrations don't match up with yours. You're Jewish; accept that the county celebrates christmas, not just vauge "holidays. You're christian; realize that christ wasn't born on December 25 [while I, on the other hand, was]. Hell he wasn't even born in winter. Celebrate it however you wish, and leave me and my athiest friends to enjoy some spiked egg nog, and a few days off work.
In the words of Mr. Garrison [of South Park]: merry fucking christmas!
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 12:15 AM
reading this thread tells me ...
... why the fucking leftists lost the elections.
... why South Park creators Matt and Trey "really hate fucking liberals"
... common sense and left-wing are oxymorons
Good solid arguments BTW, question? . Of couse, that gets you personally attacked right away in this pussy-liberal forum.
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 8:35 AM
reading this thread tells me ...
... why the fucking leftists lost the elections.
... why South Park creators Matt and Trey "really hate fucking liberals"
... common sense and left-wing are oxymorons
Good solid arguments BTW, question? . Of course, that gets you personally attacked right away in this pussy-liberal forum.
—Darwin'sBlade
You hit the nail on the head. But consider these people are only parroting what they hear from others and can't form an opinion without first checking what blather Air America is spewing. Yeah, it's liberal vitriol all the time here.
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 12:42 PM
If you're in a war, instead of throwing a hand grenade at the enemy, throw one of those small pumpkins. Maybe it'll make everyone think how stupid war is, and while they are thinking, you can throw a real grenade at them
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 12:42 PM
Edited Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 12:43 PM
—Darwin's Blade:
reading this thread tells me ...
... why the fucking leftists lost the elections.
... why South Park creators Matt and Trey "really hate fucking liberals"
... common sense and left-wing are oxymorons
Good solid arguments BTW, question? . Of couse, that gets you personally attacked right away in this pussy-liberal forum.
—Magnificent Bastard:
You hit the nail on the head. But consider these people are only parroting what they hear from others and can't form an opinion without first checking what blather Air America is spewing. Yeah, it's liberal vitriol all the time here.
wow! what is this?
i'm confused. am i actually getting some conservative support on this forum? i thought i was the only one. i appreciate the comments from both of you. am i right in assuming that you're both conservative, and if so, where does your outlook come from (religion, upbringing, your own reasoning, etc.)?
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 12:45 PM
—HocusPocus:
If you're in a war, instead of throwing a hand grenade at the enemy, throw one of those small pumpkins. Maybe it'll make everyone think how stupid war is, and while they are thinking, you can throw a real grenade at them
war is stupid? why?
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 12:55 PM
you probably think when I said stupid I also meant unnecessary.
No, I think it's necessary... and unpreventable(obviously)
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 1:08 PM
Excuse me what was your question? I honestly didn't hear you.
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 1:18 PM
—HocusPocus:
you probably think when I said stupid I also meant unnecessary.
No, I think it's necessary... and unpreventable(obviously)
fair enough. in what way is it stupid then?
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 2:08 PM
You know Dude, I myself dabbled with pacifism at one point. Not in Nam, of course.
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 2:10 PM
Edited Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 2:10 PM
I hereby petition that we reinstitute the traditional staple diet of lions: devout Christians.
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 10:14 PM
If you're in a war, instead of throwing a hand grenade at the enemy, throw one of those small pumpkins. Maybe it'll make everyone think how stupid war is, and while they are thinking, you can throw a real grenade at them
—HocusPocus
Jack Handey?!?!?!?! Is that YOU?!?!?!?
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 11:17 PM
I'm glad to see someone here appreciates Jack Handey's humor.
His jokes are the kinds that make you shoot milk through your nose funny.
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 11:37 PM
I bet he damn near killed pookie on several occasions, with the creamy nostril-missiles.
(Love ya pookie!)
Wednesday, December 21, 2005 at 12:48 AM
Y'mean that WAS a Handeyism? I was being facetious. Handey IS great, though.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 2:26 AM
wow! what is this?
i'm confused. am i actually getting some conservative support on this forum? i thought i was the only one. i appreciate the comments from both of you. am i right in assuming that you're both conservative, and if so, where does your outlook come from (religion, upbringing, your own reasoning, etc.)?
—question?
Not so much "conservative", more a blend pragmatist, realist, a practicioner of common-sense thinking and problem-solving. I was brought up Catholic, although I distrust any religous organization, my moral values are based on Christianity. The "liberal leftist" point of view to me is just crazy and dangerous, as they make it easy for the people who want to do us harm. Here are some common liberal pussy issues...
1. "The war on Iraq was a mistake (illegal)." - Saddam violated the cease-fire agreement imposed after the 1st Gulf war, making it "legal" for the US to use military force against him.
2. "The Bush administration LIED to us about WMD's." - There have been a number of official inquiries and extensive investigations from independent commitees done, and all have said they did not find any evidence of Bush "lying" about WMD's. He was acting on faulty CIA intel that WMD's were present, which by the way was also said by the British and Russian intelligence.
3. "We should pull out now." - worst thing we can do. The country would be taken over by terrorists.
4. "We should have talked more and made a deal with Saddam, or the terrorists. Military action should never be used." - typical pussy-liberal thinking. In their elitist, theoritical world, everything is solved by diplomacy, all people will listen to reason, all cultures are the same, CANNOT JUDGE!!! In the real world, some people/culture/religion only respond to force.
5. "America is BAD, imperialistic, an evil country." - they love to hate the US.
6. "The ACLU will loves NAMBLA, but hates the Boy Scouts." - these ultra liberal pussies are so DANGEROUS because they consider their theoretical concepts of interpreting the Costitution above the safety of real people, in this case, children. To them, their interpretation of "free speech" is more important than kids being molested, raped or abused.
Last point, if you ask them what they would have done different than what our government has done, they have no real sane answer. They would rather just bitch and complain, and point at mistakes, than solve the problem in a real and practical way.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 1:17 PM
Okay, vee proceed. But only if there is no funny stuff!
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:05 PM
Not so much "conservative", more a blend pragmatist, realist, a practicioner of common-sense thinking and problem-solving
I hate it when people say shit like this. Thanks for putting it early in your post so I know to stop reading.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:20 PM
I hate it when people say shit like this. Thanks for putting it early in your post so I know to stop reading.
—lastmanstanding
Again, a typical liberal-pussy response. You declare you hate it but give no reason why or offer a different point of view. I guess because liberal leftists ARE haters and very intolerant of ideas that differ from their retarded position. Although, it is impossible to defend against the truth and common sense.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:34 PM
What the fuck are you talking about? I hate it because it's something an elitist prick would say. It's an empty statement made in an attempt to legitimize your own argument. I don't know how you determined that I was a liberal; I wasn't insulting your ideals, just your stupidity.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:41 PM
Since you declared you did not read my post, how can you form an opinion about my intelligence or lack thereof?
In fact, it just tells us a lot about your retarded way of thinking.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:46 PM
Edited Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:47 PM
I can easily form that opinion because of your little self-declaration that I quoted earlier. It's something that no intelligent person would say to define what they believe. Think about it. "Not so much "________", more a blend pragmatist, realist, a practicioner of common-sense thinking and problem-solving". Every member of every party claims this, and what does it say? Not a damn thing. Haha, now that I go back to see what you've said in your post, it's even more relevant because you just spewed the average party line BS.
But I'm not your enemy D'sB. I'm not so much "liberal", more a blend pragmatist, realist, a practicioner of common-sense thinking and problem-solving
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:50 PM
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:51 PM
But I'm not your enemy D'sB. I'm not so much "liberal", more a blend pragmatist, realist, a practicioner of common-sense thinking and problem-solving
DB, I believe he just burned you, and he's from Riverside, that has to hurt.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 6:52 PM
VEE FUCK YOU UP, MAN! VEE TAKES YOUR MONEY!
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 7:52 PM
HAY GUYS REMEBER SAVE THE BABIES AND FLUET IN TARD???????????
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 8:28 PM
You think veer kidding und making mit de funny stuff?
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 9:35 PM
I just f--
Oh, wait...nevermind. Thanks for filling the gap, Chrisp, and kudos on your skill at using the "I just farted" tactic for its originally intended purpose.
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 9:51 PM
So tell me, Darwin's Blade. What country are we going to liberate next? Since we're so good at liberating Iraq, bringing them democracy (and THAT, people, is how we stop terrorism. Oh yes.)
North Korea? Saudi Arabia? They certainly are threats, aren't they?
Thursday, December 22, 2005 at 10:21 PM
What country are we going to liberate next?
Germany. Heidi Klum had to marry a black to get out of the country for fucks sake! Liberate Heidi Klum!!!!
Friday, December 23, 2005 at 5:04 PM
Exactly what I mean when these pussies don't subscribe to common sense. "What countries are we gonna invade next?" Idiots.
A person in his right mind will SOLVE THE PROBLEM IN FRONT OF HIM. A liberal pussy sees only slippery-slope ad infinitum so he can have an excuse not to do anything. Bottom line, they are scared to act or do what is necessary to fix the problem. There is a reason why "pussy" is used to describe you idiots.
This kinda stuff is like the retarded "slippery-slope" argument Adam rants about.
Friday, December 23, 2005 at 5:12 PM
I just farted again, but this time some poopie came out.
This is such a low discussion. No one's getting anywhere!
"pussy!"
"stupid pussy!"
"liberalpussy!"
(I'm sure it's upsetting to poor kittyloaf to have her name used in vain)
Friday, December 23, 2005 at 6:53 PM
It's not too upsetting, I'm a total pacifist pussy. And I'll kick anyone's ass who tries to say otherwise.
Friday, December 23, 2005 at 10:18 PM
Edited Friday, December 23, 2005 at 10:25 PM
D'sB, your characterizations of the democratic party are so far off base from what the left actually stands for, they can't be argued with. You can't seriously believe the AVERAGE democrat actually believes all the extreme nonsense you're babbling about. It would help if your knowledge of the left extended beyond what you're fed (and apparently blindly believe) from right-wing talk radio blowhards.
You could start by actually asking the dems opinion on a subject instead of asking them to respond to wild accusations.
Oh yeah, Tomorrow vee come back und cut off your chonson!
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 12:02 AM
Don't you hate when you want to pee, but you DON'T want to crap (even though you really should), and you're trying to hold back the crap while letting out the pee, and, because the stream is interfered with in this manner, it dribbles all over the rim, and splatters all over your legs?
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 5:20 AM
It would help if your knowledge of the left extended beyond what you're fed
Quoted for emphases. But I'll admit that a lot of lefties are guilty of the same thing.
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 8:56 AM
Why are you fucking people questioning DB's no spin zone!? HUH!?
Let's move onto more important topics like Eva Longoria eating without makeup on.

Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 9:04 AM
Edited Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 9:05 AM
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 9:16 AM
Is this the Eva Langoria that said in an interview that she didn't get a lot of parts because she was so fucking beautiful? She actually said beautifull people are at a disadvantage in Hollywood.
I remember hearing her on Loveline, she did not seem so megalomaniacal and ultra-narcissistic at that time.
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 9:18 AM
I think Eva Longoria is the most fantastic person on this Earth. Fuck Bono.
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 9:27 AM
My characterizations of the Democrats are not from any right-wing source, it's from the fucking network news. You pussies bitch, moan and complain so much people can't help but hear and be annoyed by it. If you would just shut up and start doing instead of babbling, you might be "heard" more. And your chairman is nutjob Howard Dean. Have you been listening to him lately? How can an average person form an opinion of democrats different from left-wing pussies?
Now, tell me your AVERAGE Democratic opinion on this:
1. Did Bush cheat Kerry out of the presidency during elections?
2. Did Bush lie about WMD's?
3. Do you support the ACLU helping NAMBLA?
4. Is France our best friend?
5. Should the military be put on the border to stop illegals from coming in?
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:02 AM
Edited Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:22 AM
1. Did Bush cheat Kerry out of the presidency during elections?
No. This is a perfect example of what I was just saying. No one actually really believes this.
2. Did Bush lie about WMD's?
No. Exaggerated? Probably. Not really the point anymore.
3. Do you support the ACLU helping NAMBLA?
You know, I always thought NAMBLA was just a joke. I looked it up on Wikipedia, though, and it seems to be a tiny group of people who are so publicly scorned that they won't even respond to letters. And rightly so. Anyone who listens to loveline would know they must be some sick fucks.
Clearly if the few subscribers are allowed to voice their opinion, the whole country will turn gay within hours.
Do I support the right to free speech, yes. Don't you? I thought only commies and muslim theocracies were into the censorship thing.
4. Is France our best friend?
No.
5. Should the military be put on the border to stop illegals from coming in?
Something should be done. I'm all for building a giant concrete wall personally. Maybe laser beams.
Vee could do things you only dreamed of!
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:25 AM
Edited Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 10:25 AM
My characterizations of the Democrats are not from any right-wing source, it's from the fucking network news
HAH!
edit: is a rimshot apropriate?
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 1:29 PM
What nationality is Eva Longoria??
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 6:27 PM
5. Should the military be put on the border to stop illegals from coming in?
Not necessarily. Land mines will do. Lots of them.
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 8:41 PM
Ok, I'll bite. Here's my liberal point of view...
1. Did Bush cheat Kerry out of the presidency during elections?
We'll never know. Of the millions of votes cast, only the 9 in the supreme court mattered. Shouldn't there be 100% certainty that our president has been elected fairly? There's speculation on who "probably" would have taken the vote, but it was never allowed to be proven thanks to the good ol boys in the supreme court. It says a lot about how much our government really values democracy.
2. Did Bush lie about WMD's?
Not just Bush. The Downing Street Memo almost certainly proves that this war was more than just the usual government incompetence. I suspect in about 30 years we'll start getting documents that confirm much more grave issues. i.e. the USS Maine, Operation Northwoods*, the attack on the Maddox, and the McCollum Memo*
*my two favorites
3. Do you support the ACLU helping NAMBLA?
This is a shill question. It's better to have an organization like the ACLU looking out for individual rights than no one at all, no matter how off-track they can get sometimes.
4. Is France our best friend?
Well without France, the US probably wouldn't have won the war for independence from Britain. It's funny how ignorant rednecks use harmless scapegoats like France.
5. Should the military be put on the border to stop illegals from coming in?
The US economy has always relied on exploiting illegal foreign labor, often integrating it into policy. The government has brought in illegal immigrants purposefully in order to obtain free labor and break strikes, exploiting their hopes for a better life. And of course, if any of these illegal immigrants who were brought in by the US government demand any form of liberty then they are immediately shipped back and replaced with less "uppity" illegals. Is that right? Anyways, I don't think open borders are necessarily the answer, but I'd certainly rather have that than programs like operation wetback.
…just my 3 cents
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 11:07 PM
Ok, I'll bite. Here's my liberal point of view...
1. Did Bush cheat Kerry out of the presidency during elections?
We'll never know. Of the millions of votes cast, only the 9 in the supreme court mattered. Shouldn't there be 100% certainty that our president has been elected fairly? There's speculation on who "probably" would have taken the vote, but it was never allowed to be proven thanks to the good ol boys in the supreme court. It says a lot about how much our government really values democracy.
—lastmanstanding
Um... that happened with Kerry too? I musta been high last year. I thought the supreme weenies only fixed the 2000 election against Gore. I'm not saying the 2004 election wasn't fixed, just that I don't remember the supreme court being involved.
Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 11:17 PM
Edited Saturday, December 24, 2005 at 11:18 PM
My bad, misread. Any other comments?
Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 7:30 AM
1. Did Bush cheat Kerry out of the presidency during elections?
We'll never know. Of the millions of votes cast, only the 9 in the supreme court mattered. Shouldn't there be 100% certainty that our president has been elected fairly? There's speculation on who "probably" would have taken the vote, but it was never allowed to be proven thanks to the good ol boys in the supreme court. It says a lot about how much our government really values democracy.
-- When the supreme court declared Bush won, and he was sworn in, that's the 100% certainty of his winning. Only liberal pussy retards with their conspiracy theories can't accept it
2. Did Bush lie about WMD's?
Not just Bush. The Downing Street Memo almost certainly proves that this war was more than just the usual government incompetence. I suspect in about 30 years we'll start getting documents that confirm much more grave issues. i.e. the USS Maine, Operation Northwoods*, the attack on the Maddox, and the McCollum Memo*
-- again this has been investigated and no wrong doing was found. Only liberal pussy retards makes definitive conclusion despite the lack of evidence.
3. Do you support the ACLU helping NAMBLA?
This is a shill question. It's better to have an organization like the ACLU looking out for individual rights than no one at all, no matter how off-track they can get sometimes.
-- a few years ago a 9 yr old boy was raped and murdered by a NAMBLA member sicko who confessed he got his ideas and was encouraged by what he learned and read on this organization. that was why they were sued, not because they were harmless perverts minding their own business, but because a child was MURDERED. Only a liberal pussy retard puts insane theoretical constitutional interpretation above the safety of children.
4. Is France our best friend?
Well without France, the US probably wouldn't have won the war for independence from Britain. It's funny how ignorant rednecks use harmless scapegoats like France.
-- Russia helped us during WWII, that did not stop them from becoming our great enemy during the cold war. So despite what France has done (which wasn't much, read your history)they have since 9-11 been in constant opposition to whatever the US does. Only a liberal pussy retard with ideological blinders on, can't see this.
5. Should the military be put on the border to stop illegals from coming in?
The US economy has always relied on exploiting illegal foreign labor, often integrating it into policy. The government has brought in illegal immigrants purposefully in order to obtain free labor and break strikes, exploiting their hopes for a better life. And of course, if any of these illegal immigrants who were brought in by the US government demand any form of liberty then they are immediately shipped back and replaced with less "uppity" illegals. Is that right? Anyways, I don't think open borders are necessarily the answer, but I'd certainly rather have that than programs like operation wetback.
-- what you said does not go anywhere in solving the problem of illegal immigration. or maybe 1 million people a year coming in illegally, draining our taxpayer money, filling up the prison system, is not a problem to your liberal pussy retarded theoritical view of the world.
Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 7:36 AM
Edited Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 7:38 AM
have you noticed the CONSISTENT theme of a liberal pussy?
1. US is exploiting, all a big conspiracy (without evidence), US is bad, etc...
2. open borders
3. retarded theories are more important than human lives
4. blame, bitch and moan, but they don't have a solution themselves
--- only a liberal pussy retard ---
Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 11:07 AM
Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 5:35 PM
-- When the Supreme Court declared Bush won, and he was sworn in, that's the 100% certainty of his winning. Only liberal pussy retards with their conspiracy theories can't accept it
The Supreme Court didn't declare that Bush won. The Supreme Court DID declare that all investigations into the validity of the election had to stop. It's not a conspiracy theory. There's not a 100% chance that Bush fairly won, and the fact that we're not certain shows the value we place in democracy.
-- again this has been investigated and no wrong doing was found. Only liberal pussy retards makes definitive conclusion despite the lack of evidence.
That's funny, because the first investigations showed that Iraq did have nuclear and biological weapons; are you going to start quoting from those too? The most recent evidence suggests that many top ranking officials including Bush lied about the reasons for going to war. But if you want to keep reading "investigations" which are years old while ignoring the most recent evidence I’ve suggested, then feel happy in your ignorance.
-- a few years ago a 9 yr old boy was raped and murdered by a NAMBLA member sicko who confessed he got his ideas and was encouraged by what he learned and read on this organization. that was why they were sued, not because they were harmless perverts minding their own business, but because a child was MURDERED. Only a liberal pussy retard puts insane theoretical constitutional interpretation above the safety of children.
Just the response I respected from such a shill question. The ACLU was protecting free speech in that case, not NAMBLA. Do you honestly believe that reading a website can brainwash you into murder?
-- Russia helped us during WWII, that did not stop them from becoming our great enemy during the cold war. So despite what France has done (which wasn't much, read your history)they have since 9-11 been in constant opposition to whatever the US does. Only a liberal pussy retard with ideological blinders on, can't see this.
Without France's support America wouldn't have won the war for independence? That's not much? Something like 90% of all the gunpowder we had came from France while we had no natural resource to even make it. Also, America's alliance with the Soviets has nothing to do with France. You're comparing a few protests to nearly annihilating the country with nuclear weapons ... nice example. You're seriously accusing me of being blind to my ideology? Haha, you're a joke brother, you don't know any of the facts and when I try to educate you, you won't respond to them.
-- what you said does not go anywhere in solving the problem of illegal immigration. or maybe 1 million people a year coming in illegally, draining our taxpayer money, filling up the prison system, is not a problem to your liberal pussy retarded theoritical view of the world.
There is no easy solution to immigration because the US needs illegal labor; it historically has and it does today. The issue of immigration is just a scapegoat to distract from more important issues. The army patrolling the border? That can't be a serious question. It's definitely something an ignorant person would say.
Anyways, it's obvious that you're incapable of arguing your beliefs in any intelligent manner D'sB. So go ahead and call everyone a liberal pussy who doesn't agree with you, at least then they'll immediately know the extent of your ignorance and avoid you. Please, for your own sake, get a real education. At least then you might be able to defend the right more effectively.
Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 6:29 PM
You have just made my point for me again. There was a reason why conservatives are in power nowadays, and your I'm-a-coward-pussy-liberal ideology is the prime example. I pity you.
That's the world we live in. Liberal pussies making all the noise and serious people quietly working in the background solving problems.
Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 8:20 PM
Edited Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 8:23 PM
Hello. Nein dizbatcher says zere iss problem mit deine kable.
Sunday, December 25, 2005 at 9:19 PM
Monday, June 13, 2005 at 11:25 PM
Re: The Jackson jury has reached its verdict.
Watching the jurors after the verdict on FOX News (you can't judge me)....... —Darwin'sBlade
'nuff said.
*fair and balanced rimshot*
Monday, December 26, 2005 at 12:36 AM
Edited Monday, December 26, 2005 at 12:51 AM
... why the fucking leftists lost the elections. ... why South Park creators Matt and Trey "really hate fucking liberals" —Darwin'sBlade
I don't think Secularism had any direct effect on the Diebold CEO who promised to "deliver" Ohio to Bush (who recently resigned after fraud accusations). That had more to do with Republicans being cowards, and breaking the law.
Trey Parker and Matt Stone are fucking pussies for selling out to the Libertarian Party. They're just tools now, they're not comedians anymore -- as you'll notice if you happen to catch any recent episodes of South Park. I'd imagine they get together with Penn and Teller at least once a week and masturbate to Ayn Rand while maning the glory hole at the CATO institute.
Fuck them, and fuck your bullshit lines. Despite any recent "bump" Bush's approval ratings have followed a steady downward trend since 9/11.
Bush's approval ratings in Black comminities were at something like 2% just a couple months ago. The Margin of error in most of these polls is around 2%. Which means not only is is possible, but even likely, that he has 0% approval among blacks in the United States.
Bush sucks, everyone knows it, and you're a retard for supporting him.
Monday, December 26, 2005 at 12:02 PM
I'd imagine they get together with Penn and Teller at least once a week and masturbate to Ayn Rand while maning the glory hole at the CATO institute.
*LOL*!!!!!!!
*maniacal rimshot*
Monday, December 26, 2005 at 4:45 PM
Monday, December 26, 2005 at 10:49 PM
Well, the hot girl with no arms made ME cry, so to hell with her.
Monday, December 26, 2005 at 11:51 PM
Interesting. I just had a dream where I was with a girl with no forearm. At first, I thought both her forearms were missing. Then I found out that only one was gone and the other is still intact. And I was like, thank God.
Darwin's Blade, you're one of those people who will support every action taken by President Bush, no matter how ridiculous it is. You truly are a dumbass, calling everyone who are opposed of war 'pussies' (really, it is getting a little iterative), and that
gun-ho attitude of yours. I agree with the person who said you protest too much. I think you are someone who's afraid of being called a pussy.
I don't consider myself as a liberal or a conservative. I'm strongly against open borders. But wait a minute! How could someone who questions Bush's actions(something liberals and democrats do) and still be against open borders!? That's because I follow logic and what seems best instead of choosing sides and being like a dog on a leash.
It'll be intersting if after twenty or thirty years there will be a documentary being made about the Bush's administration where we'll get to hear the tape recordings and to find out just how lost and clueless Bush and the rest of them at the White House are with the current warfare. If you've seen 'Fog of War' you'll know what Im talking about.
And of course, all this is under assumption, since we dont know what's really going on behind the door.
Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 11:06 PM
No i'm not a Bush fan. In fact I will list some points I disagree with him:
1. Bush is soft on the border. He has done NOTHING but talk about border security, but no ACTION has brought us to this much chaos on the border. He needs to bitch-slap Vicente Fox, but for some reason, he won't move on securing our borders. What a pussy.
2. Bush is impotent about controlling the gas price gouging by these oil companies foreign and domestic. Hands are tainted? And what's up with being so cuddly with the towelheads in Saudi Arabia?
3. Bush's stem cell research ban is so stupid it's unbelievable. I hope these politicians who are against it get some kind of terminal cancer, and then we'll see.
Those are just a few a can think of. The only reason why Bush will still beat the opposition is because compared to these fucking liberal pussies and their retarded politics, Bush looks like angel.
Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 3:45 AM
Either you're grossly misinterpreting election results, or your supporting Bush. Either way, you might be able to learn something from the unicorn people.