
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Monday, December 11, 2006 at 11:47 PM This in whole milk.
 I just tried these tonight. I think I prefer the originals.
 Funyuns went great with this:
 Mmmmm, mmmm.
 —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 6:48 PM That vanilla in milk thing is yummers. This stuff straight is too good to believe:
 —striker |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 7:09 PM Thank heavens for adblock plus 4 ff. —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
Dusty TheHick |
+ |
Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 7:38 PM Um...Rancid? Um...My gut's been giving me mild splatter-threats for most of the evening. That picture isn't much of a help to me. Still funny as fuck, though. —Dusty TheHick |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
Stryker311 |
+ |
Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 10:47 PM I want to know who stood there and took the pic. —Stryker311 |
|
|
   |
 |
mandeemoo22 |
+ |
Saturday, December 16, 2006 at 11:44 PM guys, i think kevin's mom has a myspace and she's in his top 12. —mandeemoo22 |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 12:03 AM I like how it says "Pure Vanilla Extract" and it has corn syrup in it. Love that FDA. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 12:26 AM Well the extract is pure THEN they add the corn syrup. Love those government schools and their "english" classes. It doesn't say "100% vanilla extract." Anyway, does anyone know why they add alcohol as the 2nd ingredient? Preservative? By product of extracting from the vanilla Lohan bean? —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:02 AM I'm so torn. I know the answer and have a compulsive drive to blurt it out, but I'm morally and philosophically opposed to interacting with the evil-universe Michael.
—anobody |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:10 AM Love those government schools and their "english" classes. Listen douche, you can make a retarded semantic argument all you want and be "right", but since you've suffered severe head trauma I must explain that the problem is you can still have two bottles labled "pure vanilla extract" and have one bottle be 100% vanilla and the other be 12%. There is a difference when you're cooking. For your purposes wouldn't you want to know which one had the booze and which one didn't without having to read the fine print? I guess if you're buying ingrediants at Walmart you don't need to read it--you know it's cheap-ass crap. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:10 AM Edited Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:11 AM Fine anobuddy then do what everyone else does, start another identity so you can share your wealth of knowledge. —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:11 AM BG - you're not Manny. Don't interact. —anobody |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:14 AM bedork, I didn't know I was talking to super chef here. There's nothing "semantic" about what I said (you clearly wanted to use that word to try and sound smart though). I was merely pointing out that there is nothing misleading about the labeling. —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:17 AM I didn't know I was talking to super chef here. I bake. that there is nothing misleading about the labeling. If you can't trully see the difference you're far dumber than I thought. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:32 AM Again E-N-G-L-I-S-H, learn to speak/read englishhhhhh. I never said there wasn't a difference between the two types of bottled vanilla extract super baker, only that wal mart's label was NOT misleading as you implied earlier. —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:39 AM Edited Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:51 AM What's the fanciest thing you bake? —mandeemoo22 I make some fine scones from time to time. I make some salty chocolate cookies that people go nuts for. I do some breads, although we have a machine for that now. I don't bake as much as I used to. Maybe over the break. I never said there wasn't a difference between the two types of bottled vanilla extract super baker, only that wal mart's label was NOT misleading as you implied earlier. Listen Mr. Norton (the subject of my sentence), I'm going to not agree to disagree on this one. You can try and push my buttons all you want--I'm in a good mood tonight so whatever. Go polish your guns, drink some impure walmart vanilla in some powdered milk, teach your children that there's no difference between print and reality--I don't care tonight. It all smells of dumb white trash from over here. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 1:47 AM I do some breads Man - I want some hard tack now. Someone brought some in to middle school once. Nobody else liked it and I ended up eating all the left overs. Haven't had it since, but that sounds so good right now. Maybe I wouldn't like it any more. At least, that's what I'm gonna tell myself.
—anobody |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 2:05 AM I think baking/cooking/being a chef is near the top of manly behavior. It got cast as "women's work" because men were too busy working in the fields and SOMEBODY needed to do the cooking. The reason almost all the good chefs are MEN is because good cooking is a CREATIVE act. Women are not creators they are HARBORERS and spinners (doers of repetitive activities). Proof of this is how much women BITCH AND MOAN AND COMPLAIN at having to make a meal nowadays. On the other side, you get a guy in the kitchen with the proper tools and ingredients, and with practice, he'll turn out some good food and some original food (without the bitching/moaning/complaining of a female). I haven't had enough practice to be good at it. I USED to be a better cook then I got a lazy streak, stopped caring about measuring anything, and wanting everything done NOW. It was about the time I discovered teh internets. —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
Stryker311 |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 3:03 AM CAPITIZING random words MAKES my POINTS much MORE valid. NOT. —Stryker311 |
|
|
   |
 |
striker |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 3:06 AM So start doing it for EMPHASIS then einstein. —striker |
|
|
   |
 |
pookie |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 5:44 AM Why would anyone buy vanilla when you can make your own? Just put a couple of fresh vanilla beans into a bottle of clear or dark rum or vodka. Yum. —pookie |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 11:09 AM Why would anyone buy vanilla when you can make your own? Yeah, I know. All you need is to put some eugenol in a basic, throw in a little (CH2CO)2O, add an oxidizing agent, and then add a dash of CH2COOH in acidic solution. Once you crystallize it out and re-solvate it in alcohol, you're ready for baking. Easy as pie. Just put a couple of fresh vanilla beans into a bottle of clear or dark rum or vodka. Yum. Oh.... um... yeah... [turns red] ...that probably would work too.
—anobody |
|
|
   |
 |
pookie |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 11:48 AM Dayum! That's why organic chemistry always gave me a headache. Everything looks like CHOOCH. —pookie |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 12:08 PM That's why organic chemistry always gave me a headache. I got a Jeopardy question about covalent bonds correct last week so it's all good. I blame the cute lab partners I had a huge crushes on for ruining all of my science knowledge. By the time I made it into physics I was an idiot. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Sunday, December 17, 2006 at 12:36 PM Everything looks like CHOOCH. Oooh that's good! :D
—anobody |
|
|
   |
|