|
|
 |
ZT-In-Thought |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 3:49 PM Speaking of the soft position that is Atheism... As a believer in God, I have often stated that everywhere you look everything you ponder provides evidence for a supernatural Creator regardless of how unlikely the thing you consider. How do we test this claim? We check to see if even apparently improbable issues are explained well by theism or by atheism. So, to see if we find evidence for a supernatural Creator even in the most unlikely topics, I submit to you: [ZQ10-7] Dirty Jokes. On two occasions, I publicly sparred with The Man Show host, now with ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live, calling him a crotch humorist and pointing out that TV's old romantic comedies mostly have been replaced by genital comedies. Unlike animals, human beings have a sense of embarrassment about various bodily functions which humor can exploit. Why do people commonly laugh and feel uncomfortable in public regarding reproduction and expelling waste? If human beings were not at all spiritual but strictly made of matter, consisting only of atoms and molecules, then we would have no context from which to view our base bodily functions as funny or embarrassing. So we theists describe both human and animal behavior as an expected function of our worldview. Since animals do not have spirits, they have no context from which to be embarrassed about relieving themselves or reproduction, and readily do both in public. A male horse pulling a carriage of tourists in Denver will defecate in front of his favorite mare and the rest of the world, while a human being would die a thousand deaths emotionally before doing likewise. That quote is from Bob Enyart (America's most self proclaimed right-wing, religious fanatic, homophobic, anti-choice talk show host) in a three year old thread I came across. It's a debate between him and some guy named Zakath over the existence of God at the Theology Online forums.If you ever want a perfect example of why the point-by-point online debating (what I will call "Anobodying") is a waste of time that produces no good ideas, doesn't change anyone's mind, and has no positive benefits (other than being lubricant for mental masturbaters) read that thread at Theology Online. Bob Enyart used to have a TV show in Denver. I was raised a fundamentalist Christian (if you want a recipe of how to make a ZT, that's a very important ingredient) and my Dad used to sit me down at night to watch Enyart's show. It was strange to see the my old world collide with the new. —ZT-In-Thought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZT-In-Thought |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 4:04 PM
Edited Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 4:34 PM Enyart's point is "crap" by the way. Many animals will hide/bury their shit as a sign of deference unless they're the alpha in the group. —ZT-In-Thought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZT-In-Thought |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 4:22 PM [striker getting fucked in by Gloria Steinem with a 12-inch Black strap-on] —ZT-In-Thought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZT-In-Thought |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 5:36 PM
Edited Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 5:36 PM [striker drinking frothy mugs of Oprah's period juice] —ZT-In-Thought |
|
|
|
|
striker |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 5:42 PM
(¯`O´¯)
ppp•
ppp•
ppp•
ppp•
~~~~~~~
—striker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZT-In-Thought |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 5:57 PM [striker living as a eunuch in San Francisco only eating raw fruits and vegetables] —ZT-In-Thought |
|
|
|
|
striker |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 6:15 PM "eating" = soft fondling with lips/tongue Check out the size of that pearl necklace I gave her. —striker |
|
|
|
|
Faygo |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 6:20 PM [yawn] —Faygo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
anobody |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 6:37 PM If you ever want a perfect example of why the point-by-point online debating (what I will call "Anobodying") is a waste of time that produces no good ideas, doesn't change anyone's mind, and has no positive benefits (other than being lubricant for mental masturbaters) read that thread at Theology Online. I beg to differ (though I do appreciate that I've got something named after my online persona). In my long conversation with Andrew, he changed my mind on a number of things, exposed me to a different perspective, and (I think) we both gained a better understanding and appreciation of each other's views. Contrast the point-by-point approach with something like what our own striker tends to do - picking and choosing what to respond to, omitting things that weaken your arguments, taking things out of context, and diverting / redirecting the discussion at will.
—anobody |
|
|
|
|
striker |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 6:49 PM Point by point debating is not anobodying. Writing a paragraph for each little point and giving equal long windedness for each point is anobodying. Go ahead and deride me ano, just because I am able to get to my point in under 6 paragraphs and take a clear (albeit divisive) stand in the process. —striker |
|
|
|
|
ZT-In-Thought |
+ |
Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 9:44 PM Contrast the point-by-point approach with something like what our own striker tends to do - picking and choosing what to respond to, omitting things that weaken your arguments, taking things out of context, and diverting / redirecting the discussion at will. —anobody This isn't worth wasting my handicapped typing on. I've been around long enough to know that debating obstructs doing. —ZT-In-Thought |
|
|
|
|
striker |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 12:06 AM <<"I've been around long enough to know that debating obstructs doing." Doing what? —striker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
striker |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 1:49 AM Ace at LEAST come up with your own nickname for me. Copying ano's is pitiful. —striker |
|
|
|
|
AceRockollaisAce |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 6:19 AM Ace at LEAST come up with your own nickname for me. Copying ano's is pitiful. Faggit - Dufus - Cletus - they all work but hey shitlick suits you best —AceRockollaisAce |
|
|
|
|
anobody |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 9:46 AM I've been around long enough to know that debating obstructs doing. I've been around long enough to know that doing without debating is dangerous. ano you are doing what you always warn us against - interacting with shitlick I know. I've given up - it's like pissing into the wind. Copying ano's is pitiful It's not mine - it's Dusty's. So nah!
—anobody |
|
|
|
|
striker |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 5:49 PM <"It's not mine - it's Dusty's. " The fact that I identified it with you shows how much better Dusty's sense of humor is. He used it and moved on maybe to return to it once in a while. By the way, thanks for admitting your lack of creativity/individuality (which doesn't surprise me). —striker |
|
|
|
|
anobody |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 6:36 PM Yep. Looks like you've really got my number there. The shame! The humiliation! [runs to the local gun show with tail tucked between legs]
—anobody |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
catloaf |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 8:10 PM [runs to the local gun show with tail tucked between legs] ...it's not Stryker's tail is it?
—catloaf |
|
|
|
|
anobody |
+ |
Friday, December 8, 2006 at 8:40 PM I was wondering if anyone would notice that. —anobody |
|
