
|
   |
 |
zt-in-hell |
+ |
Wednesday, August 16, 2006 at 9:51 PM I wouldn't call myself a huge fan, but I've always had an admiration for comedian Laura Kightlinger. She's popped up from time to time on the TV screen on shows such as Saturday Night Live and Loveline, as well as Will and Grace, on which she was also a writer and producer. She's very funny, and this interview she did with USA Today's Whitney Matheson proves it. The two ladies talk about Kightlinger's IFC series The Minor Accomplishments of Jackie Woodman, which Anna first mentioned in May and is yet further proof that I need a better cable package because there are just too many channels with too many good shows I'm missing. At least, I assume the show is good since she's involved with it. Perhaps it totally sucks, but I wouldn't know. That's my point. —zt-in-hell |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
Ed Thunderbear |
+ |
Friday, August 18, 2006 at 5:39 PM She has written a good book also, called Quick Shots of False Hope Also, if you're a fan, you undoubtedly know that she was together with Jack Black for a long time, like forever, and then he dashes off, in less than a year marries Tanya Haden, and now they've got the baby. —Ed Thunderbear |
|
|
   |
 |
Lefty |
+ |
Friday, August 18, 2006 at 5:49 PM Edited Friday, August 18, 2006 at 5:50 PM Life > Lefty —Lefty |
|
|
   |
 |
catloaf |
+ |
Friday, August 18, 2006 at 11:23 PM Anyone know if Laura Kightlinger has a sister who is an author? I don't remember her name now, but a while back I saw an interview with this chick who looked and sounded so much like LK I figured they just had to be related. I tried to look into it (at the time I knew what her name was) but never found anything. —catloaf |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Friday, August 18, 2006 at 11:26 PM I think she also dated Jack Black before he went and married Charlie Hayden's daughter. I wonder what Mr. Hayden thinks about his new son-in-law. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
Beat It! |
+ |
Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 6:28 AM Edited Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 6:28 AM Yeah, I've heard that mentioned before. But where... —Beat It! |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
ItHadToBeJew |
+ |
Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 8:58 PM Beat It!, did you know that Laura Kightlinger used to suck Jack Blacks cock? —ItHadToBeJew |
|
|
   |
 |
greymatters |
+ |
Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 9:01 PM Laura Kightlinger seems cunty to me, so when Jack Black did that to her, I thought it was funny. —greymatters |
|
|
   |
 |
Beat It! |
+ |
Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 9:08 PM Hmm, that does sound familiar. Although it may have been just 'Kightlinger suck big black cocks.' I'll have to check my sources. —Beat It! |
|
|
   |
 |
Ed Thunderbear |
+ |
Monday, August 21, 2006 at 9:57 AM Oh, she seems a little bit poony, but I dated a C-list actress like her once....and I'd say it's more about that they get that their looks are fleeting, and tied to their transient career path....and they're insecure. The candle is about to go out, and they're shitting themselves. Comes off as especially poony if they're smart. I'd say Jack Black just hit it and quit it, pumped it and dumped it, and moved on to a new model. Problem is, Tanya Haden is more of a butter face than Laura Kightlinger, and only two years younger. If you're going to trade up, and you've got Jack Black's pull, I say trade up for hot piece! That slice of ass in Snakes on a Plane, joining the Mile High Club in the airplane shitter, that's what he shoulda gone shopping for. Instead, he trades the smart funny one for the gifted musical one. Tanya Haden's efforts in the band 'that dog' are tremendous. Great band, unheralded, but outstanding work there. —Ed Thunderbear |
|
|
   |
 |
greymatters |
+ |
Monday, August 21, 2006 at 11:23 PM I'd say Jack Black just hit it and quit it, pumped it and dumped it, and moved on to a new model. That's the funniest part, I think Jack Black went out with Laura for like ten years. She was there when he was a bum-nobody, as soon as he breaks it big he breaks up with her, gets married and has a kid within a year. —greymatters |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 9:45 AM Edited Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 9:46 AM Tanya Haden is more of a butter face than Laura Kightlinger, and only two years younger I think they went to school together or something. but I dated a C-list actress like her once I like how you worked that in. Either way, you get a virtual high five. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
Ed Thunderbear |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 10:47 AM Thank you for the virtual high five, but I'll have to take only a high three. I was working for a production company - and residual show biz tail would drift down even to my depths - and my C-lister was fast sliding to the D-list, and eventually off the radar. She had done some Star Trek (new) TV work, and some nighttime TV crime drama and sitcom guest spots, and a couple long-running characters on two soap operas. The Star Trek stuff would get her lots of appearance work at 'Starcons'. In spite of all this, she was a MESS, synonymous with 'actress'. Insecure and egomaniacial. Close to bat shit crazy. Very hot. Very worried about her backsliding career. And ultimately, not worth the trouble, even though her looks and body would stop traffic. One last plug for Tanya Haden's work in That Dog. A great band, I have all three of their CD's. Unique vocal arrangements, string arrangements, and harmonizing, all within an edgy, tight indie-punk wrapper. Tanya, Rachel, and Petra Haden are triplet daughters of a famous jazz musician, Charlie Haden. And the lead singer, Anna Waronker, is the daughter of a famous 70's-80's session guy named Lenny Waronker, who went on to become the head of Warner Brothers records. So, if you're trying to make it in the music biz, that's a good way, get born into it. —Ed Thunderbear |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 10:52 AM I'll just put in a plug and say skip the kids and listen to their Dad. Great bass player. I saw his west coast quartet last year. Love his sax player Ernie Watts. Body that stops traffic and multiple Star Trek appearances get you a high five in this house buddy. Up until we moved we had a poster of Picard on our fridge. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
Ed Thunderbear |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 10:58 AM Fair enough on the Star Trek high five....but I was SO uninterested in it (really incapable of understanding it), I used to call the show she was on either 'Star Trek Deep Space 69', or 'Star Trek with Scary Monsters'. She laughed the first few times, but then kinda wasn't amused. And I tried to watch it, but I really couldn't get into it. Looking at her was much easier. Facil sus les yeux, as the idiom would translate poorly into French - Easy on the eyes..... —Ed Thunderbear |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 11:01 AM You're down to four fingers with Deep Space Nine. You'd be down to three if it was voyager. You could probably get a harem of fan boys to blow you if you went to a con and had proof that you did her. —bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
Ed Thunderbear |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 11:34 AM A harem of fan boys blowing me, you say?....as Adam would say, that just added five minutes to my whack time tonight. Gotta get that image processed out of the jack hopper. Before Deep Space 69, she worked on Babylon 5. Does that get me back to a high five - or any BJ's from the hot girly fans at the Starcons? Hand jobs? Uh, are there any hot girly fans at Starcons? —Ed Thunderbear |
|
|
   |
 |
Beat It! |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 11:42 AM Edited Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 11:45 AM ...nighttime TV crime drama... Oooh, was it Silk Stalkings? Oh, Mitzi Kapture with your porn star name and no nonsense attitude, wherefore art thou? —Beat It! |
|
|
   |
 |
Ed Thunderbear |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 11:55 AM Mitzi Kapture, very hot. I used to beat off to Silk Stalkings, before I moved on to Red Shoe Diaries, Women:Stories of Passion, and Compromising Situations. Some of that teasy-sleazy soft core stuff on Showtime was good whack material. —Ed Thunderbear |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 6:09 PM Edited Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 6:10 PM Before Deep Space 69, she worked on Babylon 5. Does that get me back to a high five - or any BJ's from the hot girly fans at the Starcons? Hand jobs? Uh, are there any hot girly fans at Starcons? Somehow, at first I thought you were talking about Michelle Forbes, then after I ruled that out, I went to Nicole de Boer between that and the French. Now I think you were just confused and it wasn't DS:9 it was TNG and she was Patricia Tallman (who I've almost never even heard of, but according to IMDB, she's the only one who was in a modern Trek incarnation and Babylon 5). —anobody |
|
|
   |
 |
Lefty |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 7:10 PM Star Trek > Star Wars —Lefty |
|
|
   |
 |
bguirk |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 10:05 PM Star Trek > Star Wars —Lefty Here's the proof for that: First 3 Star Wars Movies > First 3 Star Trek Movies 2nd Wars movie = 2nd Trek movie 6 star wars movies < first 6 Trek Movies Trek TV featuring the Enterprise > Droid Special
—bguirk |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 10:09 PM No need for proof. I'm willing to accept it as an axiom. —anobody |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
Lefty |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 10:36 AM ambiguous genitalia > pussy > StarCraft | Star Wars | Star Trek —Lefty |
|
|
   |
 |
TortillaFactory |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 4:13 PM Dr. Drew > Jack Bauer > penis > ambiguous genitalia > pussy > Star Wars > StarCraft | Star Trek —TortillaFactory |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
foob2011 |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 7:19 PM we need a [thing] > [thing] thread. someone start it. —foob2011 |
|
|
   |
 |
Beat It! |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 7:25 PM We have one and you're posting in it: existing off topic threads > new threads with lame concepts —Beat It! |
|
|
   |
 |
Lefty |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:01 PM Edited Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:01 PM /\ I'm going to take that as an attack, how dare you. I'm sorry the threads aren't to your liking. —Lefty |
|
|
   |
 |
Beat It! |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:12 PM Edited Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:16 PM Ummm, okay... So a thread devoted to "[thing] > [thing]" - which is a gimmick used in many threads already, by the way - is a great idea for a new thread and is far better than just continuing what was already started in this thread where the original topic had quickly run its course. (And, to be fair, so had the "[thing] > [thing]" contained herein as well.) Yeah, I can see why you'd be offended. —Beat It! |
|
|
   |
 |
Lefty |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:20 PM Edited Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:21 PM as long as we understand each other. —Lefty |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
mandeemoo22 |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:42 PM Edited Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 8:43 PM Soft elephants > Regular elephants END OF DISCUSSION! —mandeemoo22 |
|
|
   |
 |
anobody |
+ |
Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 9:00 PM Paradoxically, Pot Bellied Elephants > Soft elephants > Regular elephants —anobody |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
greymatters |
+ |
Thursday, August 24, 2006 at 8:44 AM Yeah, I can see why you'd be offended. Beat It!, I think Lefty was offended because when you said "new threads with lame concepts" Lefty thought you were talking about his Alex Jones thread which you weren't a fan of. —greymatters |
|
|
   |
 |
Beat It! |
+ |
Thursday, August 24, 2006 at 8:56 AM Yeah, I knew why he was taking it personal. That's common among people subjected to prolonged abuse, they tend to think that any aggression is pointed at them – one side-effect of living in fear of being blamed for everything is you start to assume blame everywhere even when it has nothing at all to do with you. I actually liked that Alex Jones thread though (and Lefty, for that matter). The threads I don't like I tend not to post in much (*cough* TPAM *cough*), that one however was a fun discussion. Especially the part where I nailed him on the ‘fear’ issue. —Beat It! |
|
|
   |
 |
TortillaFactory |
+ |
Thursday, August 24, 2006 at 11:16 AM Yeah, I knew why he was taking it personal. That's common among people subjected to prolonged abuse, they tend to think that any aggression is pointed at them – one side-effect of living in fear of being blamed for everything is you start to assume blame everywhere even when it has nothing at all to do with you. QFT. ...Beat It!, are you mad at me? :,( —TortillaFactory |
|
|
   |
 |
Beat It! |
+ |
Thursday, August 24, 2006 at 11:30 AM Why, no, of course not. As grey noted, you're one of the divine angels of TLC doing the Lord's work of abusing the aGA. And I see what you did there. —Beat It! |
|
|
   |
 |
foob2011 |
+ |
Thursday, August 24, 2006 at 1:11 PM Divine Depression-Inducing Angels —foob2011 |
|
|
   |
|
|
   |
 |
Lefty |
+ |
Thursday, August 24, 2006 at 7:46 PM Especially the part where I nailed him on the ‘fear’ issue. I followed up with how the truth cannot be sugar coated, and all the "crying wolf" messages have influenced people by increasing their paranoia. And I gave the two examples... —Lefty |
|