|
|
 |
adams_babymomma |
+ |
Tuesday, August 1, 2006 at 4:19 PM look what i found http://groups.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=groups.groupProfile&groupID=100237757&MyToken=bc35469c-a8c4-424d-8df8-c3c2b3aef5ed link —adams_babymomma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mikeyfish |
+ |
Tuesday, August 1, 2006 at 6:05 PM L, are you pointing out the group, or your post? —mikeyfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zt-in-hell |
+ |
Tuesday, August 1, 2006 at 9:18 PM Date: 07 May 2002 15:31:54 -0400
From: Miles Nordin
To: 720 aaahtaah arthurdent deeoot com >>>>> "zicary" == Zichary O`Tea writes: zicary> Why is it every girl's handwritting in middle school looks exactly the same? actually, depending on how you look at it, their handwriting is _more_ varied than anyone else's. Handwriting researchers have shown that secondary handwriting characteristics start becoming invariant only after losing your virginity. You will find the same thing in the writings of _some_ Catholic saints, but of course not all. The writing looks like it's all the same, but really this is because all the characteristics that handwriting science can measure are constantly changing on an incredibly small scale---between and sometimes even within
single letters. For example, you'll notice that girls who are virgins do
not always write the same kind of 'a'. ex.:
####
# ####
##### # #
# # vs. # #
# ## # ##
#### # #### ##
If you examine their work carefully, you can sometimes see particularly enlightening examples where the virgin started forming one 'a', then switched to the other mid-character.The end result is an undifferentiated sort of ``universal'' robotic handwriting that only good sex can cure. In the early days of language, all these girls would be having sex regularly, but thanks to the current oppressive legal and religious regime in the US where civil rights, free association, sex, and even access to music and movies are restricted for children by the Christian Fundamentalist Theocracy, these poor handicapped girls sometimes can't even type properly. One can hardly imagine the internal trauma they must suffer, constantly questioning what is the ``proper'' way to form a certain letter, feeling as though they have ``forgotten'' how to write a letter when in fact they merely face an excess of redundant internal patterns. On the upside, middle school girl virgins are excellent subjects for training handwriting recognition because there are fewer ``local minima''---which is one of the big problems with gradient-descent ANN training. However mining the children's minds for the benefit of Industry hardly justifies the negative health effects. In Norway, girls in secondary school are screened regularly for pregnancy because there are a variety of free, mandatory prenatal care services, and social workers found that parents were obstructing their children's access to these services by attempting to monitor and ``supervise'' their children's use of State medical care. so, now, the test results are protected by doctor-patient privilege, and semimonthly testing is provided for free in the schools and is all but mandatory, even for girls who say they are still virgins. Denmark is planning to adopt the same program, but is struggling with funding. Some schools are currently experimenting with handwriting recognition, because it can pre-screen some of the younger girls to save money on pregnancy tests, but so far I think they haven't gotten the reliability high enough to implement the program. They also face confidentiality problems with the ``stigma of virginity,'' which is not a problem with traditional binary pregnancy tests. At least one student-rights group is protesting the handwriting-recognition for this reason. HTH.
—zt-in-hell |
|
|
|
|
adams_babymomma |
+ |
Wednesday, August 2, 2006 at 1:58 PM After looking through all the advertisements and reading the essays from the 1930’ s-1940, I was able to figure out what type of lifestyles women worked, the jobs they had, and the difference between women from different classes and ethnicity. Most of the jobs that all the women worked were nursing, housekeeping, sewing, and textiles. All these jobs were considered “women’s jobs” because they consisted of doing things that women used to do back in the early years in their home. The only difference now is that they were being paid for working 40 hours per week, and they can earn an income and become independent. In the 1800’s, women did the same exact jobs but were not paid, so they had to depend on their husbands.
After looking through the photographs, I was able to realize that there was some difference in the jobs among whites, Mexicans, blacks, and Japanese. The white seem more professional, and their jobs have the right equipment, which makes it more easier. However if you compare them with the Mexican women, you will see that they have to sew the garments by hand, they don’t have a sewing machine, so this makes their job more harder, and stressful. In another photo, you will find the Japanese women working in a small room, packing aprons. They seem to be tired and stressed out. The black women are once again portrayed as servants. There is a picture of a young black girl picking cotton in the field, she seems really stressed out, also there is an older black women who is feeding a white infant. I believe that she is a servant, assigned to take care and clean the house of a wealthy white family.
Seeing the expressions on the women’s faces, tells me that the pay is horrible. They work too many long hours, their job is stressful, and they are not being paid enough to keep them satisfied. In addition, the condition of their work seems to be even worse; they are all crammed in a small, sweaty shop making garments, over a long period. There’s another photo of what appears to be middle class white women, who are going on strike holding signs that say “More money means better living conditions”. It sums it all up, the main issue in the 1940’s was that women were being underpaid and they had to endure stressful manual labor.
—adams_babymomma |
|
