|
|
 |
mandeemoo22 |
+ |
Saturday, September 3, 2005 at 7:52 PM
Edited Saturday, September 3, 2005 at 8:07 PM Rehnquist dies. That's great. Bush gets to appoint another justice, but not only that, we get a new chief justice! I swear if it's Scalia, I'm jumping out the window. You know what? It doesn't matter. I'm moving to Canada. Fuck. —mandeemoo22 |
|
|
|
|
mikeyfish |
+ |
Saturday, September 3, 2005 at 8:08 PM Get me some maple syrup. This American maple syrup just doesn't cut the mustard. —mikeyfish |
|
|
|
|
Dusty TheHick |
+ |
Saturday, September 3, 2005 at 8:59 PM Are you sitting down, Mandee? I've heard that Bush's top two choices for Chief Justice are Scalia and Thomas. —Dusty TheHick |
|
|
|
|
gouranga3221 |
+ |
Saturday, September 3, 2005 at 10:58 PM Does that mean my ovaries are in danger?
I just made the last payment on these fuckers! Seriously, who gives a shit? Like Adam has said, it's all cyclical. We were never going to do anything with stem cells because we're idiots, and noone will outlaw abortion. Everybody have a margarita. —gouranga3221 |
|
|
|
|
catloaf |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 2:09 AM Almost totally unrelated:
I used to substitute that sing-songy little "Uh oh Spaghetti-o's" thing with "cryptosporidium." —catloaf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mandeemoo22 |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 7:41 AM I am usually the one who says that Roe isn't going anywhere, but this definitely hurts my tummy a little. In October, my gov't class took a field trip to the Supreme Court and we got to sit in on one of the hearings. I hate Scalia with a passion, but he is VERY smart and he's actually pretty funny. Thomas, on the other hand, did not say a word, and I'm pretty sure he was sleeping. He is one of those cases where he is probably only a justice because he's black. Plus, Anita Hill teaches at my school, so I feel some sort of loyalty to her. I can't imagine Thomas being named Chief Justice. I wish O'Connor wasn't retiring because she would make a great chief justice. I love her, she's one of my heroes. When I saw her, she was still really smart and quick. Sorry, I feel like I have a close relationship with all of my justices. —mandeemoo22 |
|
|
|
|
Putsy ThePrick |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 1:59 PM
Edited Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 2:01 PM "I am usually the one who says that Roe isn't going anywhere, but this definitely hurts my tummy a little." —mandeemoo22 Mandee, you want to keep roe? What on earth for? Our laws have become insanely perverted because our culture caters to the feminine mindset where people don't actually read the things they support and run on pure emotion. Anyone who has actually READ the roe decision, and has any concept whatsoever of what constitutes good law, would want it off the books a.s.a.p. If a person supports abortion on demand, that is a TOTALLY different thing. (Women tie the two together, which proves they know nothing about what law is and what it's true purpose is. Women behave as if they think law exists to encourage, create, or get us closer to utopia. They deny that but actions speak louder than words.) I'm glad Rehnquist is dead because he believed that the police have all power and the citizen is their slave instead of their employer. Rehnquist also believed in the illegal war on americans possessing CERTAIN drugs. Rehnquist, even though he partially understood the 10th amendment, contined the massive perversion of the interstate commerce clause (although not as bad as the other tyrants in black robes). The roe decision is nonsense, mixed with theory, mixed with gibberish, mixed with wishful thinking, all wrapped up in a nice little package meant for the consuption of people they KNEW would never EVER read the thing in it's entirety. Things women never notice in relation to roe and the "right to privacy" that was used as it's foundation: 1. Women never notice that the "right to privacy" in roe is NEVER applied to other instances, i.e. you have no right to privacy from drug tests, various searches, traffic stops on and on and on. 2. Like all evil, roe was built on a stack of lies (kind of like the Iraq war). The main litigant has admitted that she lied and lied endlessly as that case moved up to the supreme court. Drew has talked about this strange BIOLOGICAL urge that many women have to kill their babies. Clearly this plays in to the rationalizing they do to support perversions of law like roe. It also plays in with how women decide they want to kill their baby (be it born or not), they lose all empathy for that child. They seem unable to see things from the child's perspective. In fact, I've always been amazed at how women are able to call a living child within them by another term so they can pretend it's not a person. —Putsy ThePrick |
|
|
|
|
MajandraFan |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 4:12 PM You can't shut down abortion any more than you can stop people drinking.
Just watch the movie Alfie, starring Michael Caine. —MajandraFan |
|
|
|
|
NYBret |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 4:23 PM
Edited Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 4:27 PM Another "uh oh spaghetti-o's," just in: A rescue helicopter crashed just a few minutes ago.
CNN.com doesn't have any details yet. The picture from CNN.com —NYBret |
|
|
|
|
gouranga3221 |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 4:40 PM I read Putsy's post up until he used the word "evil" in a serious context. Ooooooooohh. It's eeeeeevvvil! *Sacrifices virgin to volcano in hopes of curing AIDS* —gouranga3221 |
|
|
|
|
Dr.Drew_boogie |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 8:10 PM I don't really care about any justices. As a man the problems of abortions are only secondary to me. In my opinion abortion is wrong, especially since it has nothing to do with me. I mean what's the hassle of raising a child for 18 years, with sex on tv, games and the internets kids practically raise themselves.
I think what this thread needs is dead baby jokes. There were funnier ones but i couldn't bring myself to write them(highlight below to show).
How many babies does it take to paint a house?
Depends on how hard you throw them.
—Dr.Drew_boogie |
|
|
|
|
mandeemoo22 |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 8:18 PM Fuck you, Putsy. I know you all have this "Adam" mindset that women don't know anything about how the law or politics work, but that is entirely untrue. Shut the fuck up and don't tell me what I do and do not know. —mandeemoo22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Putsy ThePrick |
+ |
Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 11:51 PM
Edited Sunday, September 4, 2005 at 11:57 PM In a logical discussion, when someone does this: "Fuck you, Putsy. I know you all have this "Adam" mindset that women don't know anything about how the law or politics work, but that is entirely untrue. Shut the fuck up and don't tell me what I do and do not know." —mandeemoo22 ...then that person is saying they have zero to contribute logically and are ceding the point. It's a shame mandee that you decided to offer nothing logical in rebuttal, thus setting my points in concrete. When someone forfeits a debate, sure, a victory is still a victory, but I would rather win in the realm of ideas and discussion of correct principles as opposed to winning by default when the other person succumbs to their anger. Mandee's short little attack post conveyed to me loud and clear that I have hit mega pay dirt of truth (not to mention striking a gigantic king size nerve). Mandee, your post strengthened my conviction and resolve that I am on the right track. This was also noteworthy: "I read Putsy's post up until he used the word "evil" in a serious context. Ooooooooohh. It's eeeeeevvvil! *Sacrifices virgin to volcano in hopes of curing AIDS*" —gouranga3221 Yea you're right, there's no such thing as evil. All there is, is what we see. We can't judge. Everything's the same. Everything's relative. Nothing is clear. Everything's a gray area. Yep. —Putsy ThePrick |
|
|
|
|
gouranga3221 |
+ |
Monday, September 5, 2005 at 12:48 AM
Edited Monday, September 5, 2005 at 12:49 AM I'm going to second Mandee's opinion and say the following: Fuck you Putsy. BTW: Evil is a stupid term reserved for bible fuckers. Go hump jesus, you inbred hack sonofabitch. —gouranga3221 |
|
|
|
|
bguirk |
+ |
Monday, September 5, 2005 at 12:49 AM Wow--Putsy wins in the realm of ideas because he got Mandee to say "fuck you." I didn't know you could win that way! Sweet! This changes everything. —bguirk |
|
|
|
|
mikeyfish |
+ |
Monday, September 5, 2005 at 6:48 AM
Edited Monday, September 5, 2005 at 6:48 AM WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Moving quickly to fill the vacancy left by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist's death, President Bush on Monday nominated Judge John Roberts to the nation's top judicial post. "It is fitting that a great chief justice be followed in office by a person who shared his deep reverence for the Constitution, his profound respect for the Supreme Court and his complete devotion to the cause of justice," Bush said from the White House, with the judge by his side. "I am honored and humbled by the confidence that the president has shown in me," Roberts said. "And I'm very much aware that, if I am confirmed, I would succeed a man that I deeply respect and admire, a man who has been very kind to me for 25 years." Roberts accepted the offer in a meeting with Bush on Monday morning, a senior administration official said. The move came a day before the Senate was to begin confirmation hearings to consider Roberts to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is retiring. It remained unclear how the nomination would affect plans for confirmation hearings. Since his nomination for associate justice earlier this summer, Roberts has garnered praise from many Republicans. After Bush's announcement Monday, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tennessee, issued a statement saying the president "has made an excellent choice; Mr. Roberts is one of the most well qualified candidates to come before the Senate." No Democrats have said they would reject Roberts when he was named to succeed O'Connor, but some have said they have many important questions to ask him in the Senate's confirmation hearings. "This nomination certainly raises the stakes in making sure that the American people and the Senate know Judge Roberts' views fully before he assumes perhaps the second most powerful position in the United States," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee's Administrative Oversight and the Courts Subcommittee, in a written statement. "Judge Roberts has a clear obligation to make his views known fully and completely at the hearings, and we look forward to them." Bush called on the Senate to confirm Roberts within a month. The high court begins its new term the first Monday in October. Rehnquist, who quietly advanced the conservative ideology of the Supreme Court under his leadership, died Saturday. He was 80. The high court said that Rehnquist's body will lie in repose in the Supreme Court's Great Hall on Tuesday and Wednesday. His funeral will be held at 2 p.m. ET Wednesday at St. Matthew's Cathedral in Washington. He will be buried in Arlington National Cemetery. The justice, diagnosed with thyroid cancer, had a tracheotomy and received chemotherapy and radiation as part of his treatment. Roberts, a 1979 graduate of Harvard Law School, clerked in 1980 and 1981 for Rehnquist before the latter was elevated to chief justice. Roberts, 50, who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, considered the most influential federal panel outside of the Supreme Court, took the bench in 2003. He was nominated to the same court in 1992 by the president's father, President George H.W. Bush, but his nomination did not come up for a vote in the Democratic-controlled Senate before the White House changed hands in January 1993. A longtime appellate attorney, Roberts has argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court, both in private practice and as deputy solicitor general during the elder Bush's administration. Bush also vowed Monday to select a nominee to replace O'Connor "in a timely manner." O'Connor has said she will stay on the court until she is replaced. —mikeyfish |
|
|
|
|
MajandraFan |
+ |
Monday, September 5, 2005 at 10:12 AM I put my hand up for evil not existing. Good and evil? No! Good and bad. The opposite of evil is... holy!
Stand up if you're holy. —MajandraFan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Putsy ThePrick |
+ |
Monday, September 5, 2005 at 2:54 PM Stand up if I'm horny? Ok, I'm up. BTW, I named my dick "General Zod" now kneel before Zod you mayor of planet Hooston. —Putsy ThePrick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Putsy ThePrick |
+ |
Monday, September 5, 2005 at 4:19 PM *copulates repeatedly with A.B.M. in the oval office on top of the great seal of the United States*
 —Putsy ThePrick |
|
|
|
|
Dusty TheHick |
+ |
Monday, September 5, 2005 at 11:08 PM
Edited Monday, September 5, 2005 at 11:08 PM *hopes very deeply that the entire TLC population will never have any trouble telling a "P" apart from a "D" or an "H."* —Dusty TheHick |
|
|
|
|
Farty Face |
+ |
Wednesday, September 7, 2005 at 5:14 PM OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ABORTION IS GOING TO BE ILLEGAL!!! BACK ALLY ABORTIONS!!! —Farty Face |
|
|
|
|
Dark Laith |
+ |
Thursday, September 8, 2005 at 1:02 AM
Edited Thursday, September 8, 2005 at 1:04 AM I will continue doing back alley abortions whether or not abortion is legal. And whether or not the women I perform them on want an abortion. And whether or not "repeated stabbing in the gut" counts as a form of abortion. >_> —Dark Laith |
|
|
|
|
Putsy ThePrick |
+ |
Thursday, September 8, 2005 at 10:58 AM
Edited Thursday, September 8, 2005 at 11:38 AM Dark, the question is, do you cum at the end? I'm so long that Dr Tiller in that Kansas clinic prescribes me to have sex with his patients. 25 seconds with me and  ♦
♦
♦ —Putsy ThePrick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dark Laith |
+ |
Saturday, September 10, 2005 at 2:41 PM the "&mdash" part makes me think mistyped code or something. —Dark Laith |
|
|
|
|
Putsy ThePrick |
+ |
Saturday, September 10, 2005 at 2:51 PM "the "—" part makes me think mistyped code or something." —Dark Laith It's ampersand followed by "mdash" (actually two of them next to each other to give it a nice long shaft). —Putsy ThePrick |
|
|
|
|
Dark Laith |
+ |
Saturday, September 10, 2005 at 2:54 PM I think you forgot the semicolon though. I don't see it. —Dark Laith |
|
|
|
|
Putsy ThePrick |
+ |
Saturday, September 10, 2005 at 3:02 PM What would a semicolon do and where would it go, because the whole thing turned out the way I wanted it to look anyway? —Putsy ThePrick |
|
|
|
|
Dark Laith |
+ |
Saturday, September 10, 2005 at 3:08 PM Um, it'd go at the end, wouldn't it? I mean, that's how you type characters like that. It doesn't look right to me. Maybe it's the browser, I don't know. —Dark Laith |
|
