Thursday, September 1, 2005 at 11:53 AM Don't get me started on that traitor shithead Drew who says ironically uneducated (and politically correct) sputum like "women are more evolved." Anyway, in that article was a doozie that I think the writer meant to be funny: "Still, after all this work, researchers are only at the very earliest stages of figuring out why we are so much smarter than monkeys. "The original idea was by comparing [chimps' genes]with the human genome we would discover why we write poetry or become reporters." Yea, reporters are sooo smart. lmao Lately, ass kiss Drew has been saying almost every day how there's just tons more information on the "x" chromosome, and since women have two of them, they have loads more genetic information. He's so busy implying that women MUST therefore be superior, that he never bothers to say (not even once that I've heard) just what is actually ON all those extra genes that women have. Basic probability will tell you that there has to be a lot of duplication going on with having two "x" chomosomes. The implications with this are enormous. This could explain why women don't like to learn an awful lot of things (not just about world war II). They are so used to having to deal with so much information (at the genetic level) that they are swimming in (much of it duplicate), that they either are overwhelmed by it all and don't want to process any more, or think they already know everything. They don't seem to watch Oprah for new information per se, they seem to watch her to observe other women's priorities, as they all try to "juggle having it all." They seem to buy Cosmopolitan/Redbook/Glamour etc every month only to observe what other women are doing/saying/thinking as opposed to actually gaining new data. Proof of this is how these magazines shuffle around the same topics every month, just with a different half naked model on the cover (who was probably on the cover 6 months ago). It's not p.c., but I have a theory that nature uses the female as sort of a mule for those 2000 genes (each "x" has 1000) and nature never intended them to use/understand them all. I'd bet that if Drew actually got into what was ON those 973 more genes that women have, his "women are more evolved" opinion would unravel pretty quick. —Putsy ThePrick | 
