Friday, January 14, 2005 at 12:14 PM I figured it was like those pregnancy/baby magazines - their readership turns over every few years, as an individual woman stops being pregnant or tires of the novelty of pregnancy information, so they're free to reprint articles every five years or so. That's how there can be so many damn magazines about babies and being pregnant, while there aren't enough advancements in the subject matter to warrent a monthly discussion. Cosmo reader attrition is probably due to switches in mindset and subscription to Good Housekeeping or Ladies' Home Journal, not by fatal Cool Whip-caused yeast infections. —Dubious Merit | 
