|
|
 |
ankiedada |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 1:46 PM Hi all, Does anyone know where the loveline studio is located (physical address would be helpful)? I am planning to visit LA for the first time this December and January, and I'd love to visit the Loveline studio. Does anyone know if there is a place (if one even exists) fans of Adam and Dr. Drew can wait to possibly see them? Thanks again! —ankiedada |
|
|
|
|
Thomas/Frope |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 3:40 PM the KROQ studio is where Adam, Drew, Lauren, Chris, and a few others are during the show. It's 5901 Venice Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90034. You can wait outside to see them b4 they get to the show (Drew might give you the time of day; Adam, however, waits until the last second before it starts to get in, so there'd be no time.) I'm sure they'd be glad to get a picture with you. —Thomas/Frope |
|
|
|
|
puck71 |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 3:42 PM Why would you need the time of day? Loveline starts at 10!! :-p —puck71 |
|
|
|
|
ankiedada |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 4:05 PM Also, do you guys know if they will be at the studio anytime between the 24th of December, 2004 and 2nd of January, 2005? —ankiedada |
|
|
|
|
Colin |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 4:24 PM I smell stalker or nutjob... Anyone else? —Colin |
|
|
|
|
puck71 |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 4:58 PM Very doubtful... —puck71 |
|
|
|
|
JP |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 5:01 PM and anderson and the phone screeners are at the westwood none studio —JP |
|
|
|
|
thejoeinme |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 5:51 PM "I'm sure they'd be glad to get a picture with you." Just don't ask them to sign a calendar, or you'll ruin Drew's week ;) —thejoeinme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
daveman |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 7:23 PM i always thought that it was located in the magical land of radio —daveman |
|
|
|
|
Colin |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 8:19 PM Right near Oz, right?  —Colin |
|
|
|
|
steve |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 8:24 PM That's right Dave -- It's located right by Adam's dad's house -- Y'know, 'cause he's the president of radio... :) —steve |
|
|
|
|
theweed420us |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 10:05 PM Jesus Christ at a fag pride parade, I can't for the life of me remember what adam calls those people outside the studio hounding for autographs... I'm not gonna butcher it and even try... But you are one of those, man. Please, don't show up and hound them. It will only make adam want to quit sooner. —theweed420us |
|
|
|
|
Colin |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 10:07 PM Spaz + loser = splooser —Colin |
|
|
|
|
Kevin U. |
+ |
Monday, November 15, 2004 at 10:07 PM Sploser, or Sploozer - however you want to spell it. —Kevin U. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
digger |
+ |
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 12:19 AM So let me see if I got this right? Back when Adam/Drew were working out of Culver City (and berating the Culver City PD, etc) they were using the Westwood One studio? I wish they would get everybody back together again in the same studio and stop this remote crap...
—digger |
|
|
|
|
digger |
+ |
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 12:24 AM Sploser, or Sploozer - however you want to spell it.
Well...this is the Internet and all...and folks on the Internet spell 'loser' as 'looser'.
So...technically the correct Internet spelling would be 'splooser' ;) —digger |
|
|
|
|
Colin |
+ |
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 12:49 AM A single "o" spelling would be pronounced like "closer", as in "close" the door, not "closer" to me. A long "o", for those who like little umlat thingys over their letters. The two "o" spelling makes it "ooooh", instead of "oh". —Colin |
|
|
|
|
Colin |
+ |
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 12:51 AM Well...this is the Internet and all...and folks on the Internet spell 'loser' as 'looser'.
Well, they're fucking tards, now aren't they?  —Colin |
|
|
|
|
Dark Laith |
+ |
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 10:47 AM A single "o" spelling would be pronounced like "closer", as in "close" the door, not "closer" to me. A long "o", for those who like little umlat thingys over their letters. The two "o" spelling makes it "ooooh", instead of "oh". What? Why bother with all that? This is the English language, we can make exceptions and destroy rules as we please! —Dark Laith |
|
|
|
|
Dusty TheHick |
+ |
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 4:36 PM Since we've gone onto the tangent of common internet sytax errors, is ANYone else bothered by folks (read: "tards") who say "should of," instead of the correct "should HAVE?" —Dusty TheHick |
|
|
|
|
Dark Laith |
+ |
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 4:37 PM It bothers me, but other things bother me more, so by comparison I don't notice it. —Dark Laith |
|