Wednesday, November 10, 2004 at 10:08 AM Adam is pretty insightful at times, but not always right. This is one of those topics I think he has a very valid point. If there was a way to ascertain truth without needing a jury, why not try and develop it? " I wonder how he would hold up in a real debate about issues w/ someone like O'reilly. (sorry, but despite the bad press about him lately, he's the only one iI can think of that debates well)" I've watched O'Reilly debate. He mostly resorts to authoritarian bullying whenever he's on the ropes. I'd actually enjoy "debating" him because I'd bet with my stoicism and confidence I could set him off in just a few minutes. I don't know how Adam would fair against him, but I'd wager good money an informed Dr. Drew could run circles around O'Reilly any day of the week. —clodhopper | 
