|
|
 |
Dark Laith |
+ |
Saturday, September 18, 2004 at 9:51 AM ...Drew said it was about male mammals, which is a specification he's never made before (to the best of my recollection). Now, I still think the story's point is correct, but... shouldn't it have occured to him that this story would seem like a bad example, since roosters are avians and not mammals? —Dark Laith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
joe bloggs |
+ |
Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at 11:07 AM 1. The story/joke most likely never occured. It's an old joke, used to illustrate a point.
2. Although the story is told with birds, the concept in biology (reinitiation of sexual behavior in a "sexually satiated" animal in response to a novel receptive mate) applies in general to all animals. —joe bloggs |
|
|
|
|
Dark Laith |
+ |
Thursday, September 23, 2004 at 6:39 AM
Edited Thursday, September 23, 2004 at 6:40 AM 1) No, really? I figured Coolidge always got farmers telling him about their animals' copulating habits.
2) Yeah, but still. He said "mammal." Why the hell'd he say "mammal." —Dark Laith |
|