Tuesday, September 14, 2004 at 1:33 PM That Glick guy seemed to be well spoken, with O'reilly saying 'shut up, shut up' several times, and always to well said points. Why didn't O'reilly counter any points or ask any questions that might bring those points into disrepute? He doesn't seem like a man who can think on his feet.
I wonder if Glick was as composed as he seemed in text.
You can't rationalise emotion, or with emotional people. —MajandraFan |
