Tuesday, September 14, 2004 at 12:03 PM The guy was espousing that AMERICA was responsible for 9-11. He was clearly a radical nut using his father's death to crap on the US. His arguments and speeches were not based on facts, so Oreilly cut him off, as he should. I read all the negatives on Oreilly but when I read the transcripts, I see a fair, tough interview. I don't get it ... —crumple1 |
