Adam often rants about his simplistic notion of just sticking the monitors on someone and--presto!--instant truth. So we can just dispense with judges and juries and let a machine do all our thinking for us. Trouble is, current lie detectors aren't really science. They are more of an art: increased sweating and heart-rate can mean almost anything; they don't necessarily mean a suspect is lying. (Maybe the suspect merely feels guilty, which isn't proof that he's lying. Innocent people can feel guilty, especially if they're neurotic.)
Practical, reliable lie detectors are not here yet, but they could be, in the not-too-distant future. These new machines, which work by scanning the brain, would open up a lot of interesting and difficult civil liberties questions. Adam would be pleased, though, and that's the important thing.
—Saffeau