|
|
 |
howdareyousir! |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 1:18 PM ...can anyone summarize what he said about Italy and missing the show Sunday night? Was he pissed about missing? Did he catch hell from Ann? Did he like Italy? —howdareyousir! |
|
|
|
|
Agent 007 |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 2:14 PM You didn't miss much. Most interesting revelation: Drew says Bill Clinton is an alcoholic. Good times! —Agent 007 |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 3:34 PM Plus, the guest was really shitty. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
puck71 |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 3:53 PM I think the guest was fine. I was hoping there wouldn't be a guest so we could hear more about the trip, so in that sense I was kinda annoyed by the guest, but it had nothing to do with the actual quality of the guest, at least for me. —puck71 |
|
|
|
|
howdareyousir! |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 4:02 PM I agree - I must say, I am almost always annoyed when they have a guest. They are so much better alone! Especially when it's Steve-O and whatshisname. What a couple of dicks. —howdareyousir! |
|
|
|
|
superhew |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 4:10 PM steve-o was pretty good last time he was on. it was interesting to hear about his coke addiction. yea, it was too bad that they had a guest on. i was hoping drew would have mentioned more about how he felt on sunday. it was hilarious listening to drew make fun of adam when he was out. —superhew |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 5:40 PM What annoyed me was how the guest got on Adam's case about being funny during serious calls. That's how Loveline works, get over it. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
puck71 |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 6:23 PM Yeah I was kinda annoyed by that too, but he only mentioned it once and really seemed more surprised by it than anything. He didn't get on anyone's case too much. —puck71 |
|
|
|
|
baja |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 9:09 PM I agree -- no guest would have been ideal for Adam's first night back so he could rant full speed. But did anyone notice how much ADAM liked having that guest (Darrell Hammond from Saturday Night Live)? Another high octane comic mind in the studio seems to get his motor running. Best line about Italy: "It's sort like Mexico if it had studied for the SATs." —baja |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 11:18 PM
Edited Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at 11:21 PM Worst line about Italy: "No one wants to work" -Drew That's ignorant commentary. So he did not see anyone running around like a chicken with his balls in a pinch (like Drew). They enjoy life. There is a time to work. There is only so much time to enjoy friends, the beauty of the day, a sunset, art so why waste life away like Drew? It is a different mindset. There is nothing lazy in it as Drew's comment implied. Don't bother defending him, he meant Italians seem lazy and indifferent to his needs. —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
stass |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 2:43 AM The thing about Darrel Hammond is that he suffered horrible abuse at the hands of his parents. I think I heard this on a previous loveline he was on [though I am not positive]. But it was frightening. So that is why he reacted that way. I wish they would have gotten into that on the air though. —stass |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 3:03 AM
Edited Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 3:04 AM When Hammond was on Stern recently it seemed like Howard was abusing him. At one point he bated Darrell with "we should do something together." Darrell agreed being politely gracious then Howard yanked the invitation back and said something in effect pushing him away. Later Howard probed into Hammond's sexlife and made an issue out of his not having a girlfriend at that moment and masturbating. Howard put him down and elevated himself because he had his girlfriend Beth. The interview had a mean-spirited undercurrent. It makes sense that Hammond would continue to find abusers ready to play the role throughout his life if it was in his past. Adam said Drew was having his rare moment of good radio when he suggested they let Hammond do some impersonations. Then Adam proceded to interrupt and hog the mic cutting Hammond off multiple times. We can listen to him almost every night of the show. So what if he has been gone for a week in Italy. Hammond is on once every two or three years and has a lot to offer. Adam seemed like he wanted to impress him maybe hoping for some opportunity somewhere in the future. NOT that he wants anything to do with SNL. —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
Angel |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 6:20 AM I think Italy is just what Adam needed...a vacation. He came back rested. He actually took the blame for the travel plans..not returning in time for the show Sunday. He mentioned his wife Lynette getting sick on the way back and his concern for her. I was expecting a ranting and raving, angry Adam; but, he was cool.
I wonder if he heard what Dr. Drew said about him on Sunday (tape of the show). I know Dr. Drew was joking to some degree; but, I was kind of surprised to hear him say what he did about his "comedic sidekick" as he called Adam. I think if Dr.Drew really wanted to take more calls a night, he could probably tell Adam to cool it a bit. It was very interested hearing Dr. Drew answer the calls that came in Sunday; he was wonderful.
I haven't posted in a while. I hope everyone who posts here and is reading this thread is doing well and enjoying the start of the summer season. (two weeks away;but,when school is out and the weather gets warm in Ohio...it's summer.)
—Angel |
|
|
|
|
puck71 |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 6:53 AM To be fair, nobody anywhere really WANTS to work...lol —puck71 |
|
|
|
|
illyB |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 8:09 AM
Edited Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 8:09 AM Wait a sec, I WANT to work!! ...at a chocolate factory, run by big-breasted hookers... —illyB |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 8:37 AM Adam's Crows, can you do anything besides bitch about what goes on during the show? Jesus christ, I'm sick of your constant bitching. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Saffeau |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 9:09 AM I feel a little unfair piling on AC after Jeremy just finished abusing him, however... AC, it's nice to see you defending the good name of the Italians, but is it only because you yourself might be of Italian ancestry? Why have you never defended the other ethnicities so regularly smeared by the cynical wit of the Loveline hosts? One thing I can't stand is selective righteousness. Sensitivity for me, but not for thee, I guess. —Saffeau |
|
|
|
|
steve |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 2:36 PM *Ahem* Really? —steve |
|
|
|
|
Saffeau |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 3:05 PM Yes, really, steve. Are you implying something? I've never complained about Adam's ethnic jokes or Drew's racial generalizations. Or anything else about Loveline. —Saffeau |
|
|
|
|
j4k3 |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 4:37 PM
Edited Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 4:41 PM Adam's Crows wrote: When Hammond was on Stern recently it seemed like Howard was abusing him. At one point he bated Darrell with "we should do something together." Darrell agreed being politely gracious then Howard yanked the invitation back and said something in effect pushing him away. Later Howard probed into Hammond's sexlife and made an issue out of his not having a girlfriend at that moment and masturbating. Howard put him down and elevated himself because he had his girlfriend Beth. The interview had a mean-spirited undercurrent. It makes sense that Hammond would continue to find abusers ready to play the role throughout his life if it was in his past.
Thank God for Howard!
I missed almost a week of Loveline because Adam was out and his first show was with some boring fuck who didn't have a clue what the show was all about! How dare he criticize Adam for his genius comedic replies? Doesn't he know that's how the show works?!? That Drew and Adam plays the good cop/bad cop role?!? That Adam's there for entertainment?!? I thought he's been on the show before?! What a retard! I bet he cried and started sucking his thumb after the Howard interview. He's not a real man. —j4k3 |
|
|
|
|
j4k3 |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 4:39 PM Oh, and don't even get me started when he cut Adam off when he was doing the whole Chief-Thunderbear-Indian-talk thing! "I thought you were speaking Chinese..." Moron. —j4k3 |
|
|
|
|
Leo12181 |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 4:54 PM You did not miss much...the guest was a downer and Adam was still feel'n the jet lag...I expect adam will be back on the ball by wensday —Leo12181 |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 4:58 PM Adam was just fine last night. I loved the rant about how the US is based too much on laws. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 at 11:38 PM I don't know what the fuck these responses are supposed to mean. Several are from the same person posting under different names so I am not wasting time responding to him. BTW I am not Italian. I just love the art and the culture.
—Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Thursday, June 10, 2004 at 10:13 AM Several are from the same person posting under different names so I am not wasting time responding to him. What a half-assed pussy response. You're so full of shit that I can smell it through my monitor. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
superhew |
+ |
Thursday, June 10, 2004 at 1:26 PM thats kinda like......Smell o Vision! 
—superhew |
|
|
|
|
wmansir |
+ |
Thursday, June 10, 2004 at 2:49 PM If anything Hammond seemed to be off during the show. He even admitted late in the show that he was thrown by the calls and couldn't bring the funny with such serious issues. But before they took a single call he was bringing the show down. As soon as Adam and Drew requested a character he was like "I don't know...let's just talk and see what happens". I'm not sure if he didn't want to be "just an impressionist" or if he had some pre-arranged bits and was uncomfortable straying from them. Also, Adam was about to start on a big "foriegn countries" rant when Hammond basically cut him off at the knees by saying "you know what I miss most is due process", which of course got them side-tracked on the carribean drug arrest story. It was an interesting story but it was told in a half-assed way. I remember it being much better the first time he was on. —wmansir |
|
|
|
|
Cracked |
+ |
Thursday, June 10, 2004 at 11:10 PM "Hammond basically cut him off at the knees by saying "you know what I miss most is due process", which of course got them side-tracked on the carribean drug arrest story..." —wmansir You overlooked Adam's intro question posed to Hammond. Initially Hammond could not think of anything then after Adam started talking Hammond remembered something he could talk about. Hammond does seem to rely on scripted bits. Most impressionists do. Back when Rich Little was one of the biggest around his headline shows were not that great. He was a good impressionist but Little is not a funny guy in his own light. Hammond can be funny but his impressions are tied to a context. Now a impressionist that is hilarious is Dana Carvy. His impressions are more goofs than acurate portrayals of different characters. It also affords him the freedom to be spontaneous. Lately he does not even say words, he just makes noises and mimicks the mannerisms and you still know it is Bush, Clinton, or whoever. —Cracked |
|
|
|
|
Cracked |
+ |
Thursday, June 10, 2004 at 11:38 PM "What a half-assed pussy response. You're so full of shit that I can smell it through my monitor." —Jeremy Jeremy(?), I don't give a rat's ass that you are Silent Virgin. What is this bullshit? You're always looking to stir up conflict. I've had an ass full of this Get some therapy, read a book, listen to some classical music, get out of your bedroom and meet people in person, find a girlfriend. The attention of a female, hold her hand, kiss... I guarantee you will be a happy man. —Cracked |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 3:29 AM
Edited Friday, June 11, 2004 at 3:30 AM "What a half-assed pussy response. You're so full of shit that I can smell it through my monitor." —Jeremy He says from the safety of mom and dad's house. Bug off, pest! —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:26 AM
Edited Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:26 AM ...says the man (and I use that term loosely) with 18 different accounts on this site. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 12:15 PM And sadly, that's as close as Adam's Crows/Cracked will get to one in his life. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Cracked |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 4:29 PM Jerm, That's good, accuse everyone of your crime to throw off the attention. Are you also helping OJ look for his wife's killer? Looks like you have experience dodging the truth. —Cracked |
|
|
|
|
Bosie |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 6:47 PM I wish SV would show everyone's IP address. It would probably turn out that there are only four people posting on this forum. What a circle jerk. —Bosie |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 8:24 PM
Edited Friday, June 11, 2004 at 8:24 PM You're the only one (besides AC, but that's just you under a different name) accusing me of posting under more than one account on this site. And of course you accuse me of being SV, just so that if SV says anything contrary to what you accuse, you can say "Doesn't matter, you're Jeremy anyway so of course you'll lie about it." Sounds a lot like what religions do, making claims that are so outlandish that they can't possibly be (dis)proven. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
superhew |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 8:50 PM if cracked really was AC, then we would know for sure that jeremy was SV, because only SV has access to logs and ip's and the likes. i seriously doubt jeremy is SV, but then if (s)he was, who really gives a damn? its his (her) forum so (s)he can do what ever the fuck (s)he wants to do with it. —superhew |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 9:31 PM I'm not basing my opinion on IPs and neither is AC/Cracked. You don't have to have access to a person's IP in order to claim that they're posting on multiple accounts. You just have to look for clues in what they say, and how and when they say it. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 9:56 PM
Edited Friday, June 11, 2004 at 10:07 PM "You're the only one (besides AC, but that's just you under a different name) accusing me of posting under more than one account on this site. And of course you accuse me of being SV, just so that if SV says anything contrary to what you accuse, you can say "Doesn't matter, you're Jeremy anyway so of course you'll lie about it." Sounds a lot like what religions do, making claims that are so outlandish that they can't possibly be (dis)proven." —Jeremy "Outlandish"??? wtf? Religion? That is way out-landish. I invite you/SV to demonstrate that I am or am not Cracked and that SV is or is not Jeremy and several other names here. One reason there aren't a lot of people agreeing that you are SV is that most of the members posting either know SV through their own fan collectives like Trig or ZT or NJC or they are in fact Silent Virgin in disguise. The rest are not around often enough to see the pattern, the stroke me stroke you arguments and coincidental posts. "who really gives a damn? its his (her) forum so (s)he can do what ever the fuck (s)he wants to do with it." —superhew It doesn't matter? Why wouldn't it matter? No one is saying you can't do whatever. That is stupid logic. It matters that this forum may be 95% bogus run by a jerk off dooping people. I don't see SV proving he is not anyone. The level of posting that some of these a-holes have demonstrated you would think he would want to distance himself from them once and for all. Notice who is attacking me for pointing this out. Why shoot the messenger? Take a few minutes to click through my post history to see the content. I am not posting for the sake of arguing or meddling. I have something to say or I don't post. Unless I am provoked I post reasonably worthy commentary. Guilty people get mad for getting caught and look for people to draw attention away from them. All SV has to do is demonstrate he isn't Jeremy or that I am Cracked or whoever else. You would expect him to want to promote integrity instead of bogusity. —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
illyB |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 10:16 PM whoooooooooo cares ?! —illyB |
|
|
|
|
Silent Virgin |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 10:19 PM | howdareyousir! | 9200 | | Agent 007 | 1962 | | Jeremy | 4407 | | puck71 | 6299 | | superhew | 7523 | | baja | 8864 | | Adam's Crows | 6928 | | Angel | 532 | | illyB | 3340 | | Saffeau | 9254 | | steve | 8860 | | j4k3 | 7442 | | Leo12181 | 8915 | | wmansir | 8408 | | Cracked | 7850 | | Bosie | 9398 | | Silent Virgin | 6214 |
¡Basta!I don't know why every other argument in this forum degenerates into the identity issue. I don't like discussing how the forum works, but this time I'll make an exception, just so we can lay this issue to rest. Each of you is given a cookie by this forum; each cookie has a number. The forum records which cookie a post came from. In this thread, the cookies are as shown on the right. Angel wins by having the oldest cookie. I'll send you out a free windbreaker :-) I used to have cookie #1, but I lost it when my Internet settings became corrupted :-( Notice that each person has a unique cookie. Had two people had the same cookie, you'd know they were the same person -- or in the same place (e.g., two people living in the same house sharing a computer). What's more, the cookies are stable over time -- i.e., every post from Adam's Crows came from cookie #6928; every post from Cracked came from cookie #7850; every post from Jeremy came from cookie #4407. So unless someone is running around to different computers to post in this forum, you can be pretty sure that each poster in this thread is a unique person. (And if people are running around to different computers, God bless 'em.) If you are posting under multiple names, I won't blow the whistle on you; frankly, I don't care. As I have said in the past, I myself use a different name sometimes; but you would be mistaken to think that I am a frequent poster under any name... I am the Silent Virgin, after all. Of course, it would be difficult to prove this to you, without making each of you moderators. So, I invite all of you tech-savvy people to look at the www.dolland.net cookie in your browser. Mine looks like this: 20040131%3A1846%3A1%3A180%3A-8... Cleaning up the encoding (%3A -> colon), we get 20040131:1846:1:180:-8... The number after the first colon is the cookie number, but it is in hex. Take 0x1846 and convert it to decimal and you get 6214, as in the table. Unless your browser deletes cookies, you should be able to verify that your cookie number matches the number I have given in the table, and thereby gain some assurance that I am not making this up. Let's move on, shall we? —Silent Virgin |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 10:41 PM "Moderator Adam's Crows" I'll be the UN weapons inspector and verify there are no WMD's. Where do I sign up? —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 10:51 PM Well SV, I must admit that you have certainly designed a very slick system. I tested it out by creating another account and checking the cookie created when I logged in to that account. Sure enough, it came out as 0x1137, which is 4407. I don't know how you did that, but I like it. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Bosie |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 10:55 PM Are you kidding? It's the easiest thing in the world to delete a cookie and get a different one from the same terminal. Show the IP numbers. —Bosie |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:09 PM Jesus christ, that was retarded of me. I didn't even delete the cookie after logging out of the site. Of course, after deleting the cookie and logging in using my regular account, the number changed. I apologize for my retardation, and take back my misguided praise of SV's "clone-proof" system. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:16 PM
Edited Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:25 PM Unfortunately this doesn't hold up as proof. You have listed numbers. We can only take your word for them being what you say they are. You are one of the defendants and you admit in that post "...If you are posting under multiple names, I won't blow the whistle on you; frankly, I don't care..." For all we know you typed in random numbers when necessary to disguise duplicates. Of course the real people would only be able to confirm their number. Only alias names you are using would have duplicates so who is going to see that? Also, it is once again pecularly coincidental that you jumped in and Jeremy was also around to jump in yet Jeremy has not posted anything before or after this general time (11:00pm). Both of you just happen to be lurking at this time? This and countless similar coincidences cast clouds of suspicion. Why not make me Moderator, if not just for a day, and I will verify there truly are no WMD's Silam Vusein? —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
Silent Virgin |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:32 PM Very well, Adam's Crows. You are now a moderator for a day. Your coach turns back into a pumpkin at midnight, so enjoy it while it lasts. Of course, after today, you will have to prove that you are not S.V. —Silent Virgin |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:41 PM Ha! SV is hiding the alien bodies from Roswell on his server!!!! There are no signs of WMD's. —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:47 PM
Edited Friday, June 11, 2004 at 11:47 PM Since we can't trust AC (or anyone for that matter), how about you just make IPs visible to everyone for a day? —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
ZT |
+ |
Saturday, June 12, 2004 at 6:00 AM
Edited Saturday, June 12, 2004 at 6:17 AM Mine is 135 in IE. Its the smallest of all. :( But my Mozilla cookie is 4740, which is bigger than Jermey's. :) However, the retardation level of this thread is at least 231890157358917345034957896r49134t57976918571348957134890576134890348907 I don't know what the 'r' and the 't' are doing in that number, but you can rest assured that they just mean this thread is that much more retarded. I just wish Gay Nigger would come back and save the day. Sometimes, I pretend that Gay Nigger is Oscar Wild, and that he has sex with Bosie. —ZT |
|
|
|
|
Saffeau |
+ |
Saturday, June 12, 2004 at 8:08 AM I thought I'd heard that name before. Could it be Pan Pan's alter ego? He hasn't posted here in a couple of days. —Saffeau |
|
|
|
|
Cracked |
+ |
Saturday, June 12, 2004 at 6:05 PM "...the retardation level of this thread ..." —ZT At what point does the high number graduate to ZTard from retard, expert? Just kidding :-) —Cracked |
|
|
|
|
superhew |
+ |
Saturday, June 12, 2004 at 7:07 PM zt, you spelt "Jeremy" wrong again. —superhew |
|
|
|
|
ZT |
+ |
Sunday, June 13, 2004 at 12:33 AM superhue - I don't know what you're talking about. Jermey, is Jermey, is Jermey. —ZT |
|
