|
|
 |
Jeremy |
+ |
Monday, March 8, 2004 at 10:34 PM
Edited Monday, March 8, 2004 at 10:34 PM That was a classic! —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Thomas/Frope |
+ |
Wednesday, March 10, 2004 at 10:17 AM Hah Yeah -- I was on hold, and he was like "You can say boob, but you can't say tit!" And i'm so used to listening with the 8-second delay that I thought, Wow, that got through... —Thomas/Frope |
|
|
|
|
Adam's Crows |
+ |
Wednesday, March 10, 2004 at 9:11 PM I guess you had to be there? It's really just like saying you can say weener but you can't say cock. What's not to see there? You can't use the gutter level term for a lot of things. There are worse words than tit but it is still crass. —Adam's Crows |
|
|
|
|
dotcomse |
+ |
Wednesday, March 10, 2004 at 10:25 PM I think he liked it because it was ironic that they bleeped what he said. —dotcomse |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy |
+ |
Thursday, March 11, 2004 at 12:30 PM Yes, that's why I liked it. —Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
MrBrando |
+ |
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 at 3:57 PM the whole argument was that it's just words and who decided you can't say tit but you can say boob. Like when say sugar or instead of shit, they mean the same thing. Yet as we all know from south park, if he say shit 300 times the world could end. —MrBrando |
|
|
|
|
steve |
+ |
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 at 8:01 PM I like when networks give a specific number of times you can say a certain word -- for example: TLC is notorious when it comes to limits on the word 'ass'. You'll hear someone say 'ass' about three times and by the fourth time it gets edited. —steve |
|